RFE 质疑「是否处于有利位置」（Dhanasar 第二要素）时会怎么写

“In this case, it is unclear if the endeavor is simply to only work as [job title] or also work as a business or studio owner. For the former, the Petitioner has demonstrated the beneficiary is well positioned to work as [job title]. However, with regard to the beneficiary working as a business or studio owner, the record lacks evidence which shows they would be well positioned to work in that position.”

在本案中，尚不清楚该事业究竟仅仅是继续担任 [职位名称]，还是也包括作为企业主或工作室经营者。就前者而言，申请人已证明受益人处于有利位置去担任 [职位名称]。但就受益人作为企业主或工作室经营者而言，记录中缺乏证据表明其处于有利位置去从事这一角色。

该案例在补件回应后仍被拒绝。

在一份申请材料里描述两项事业，会把移民官的分析拆成两半，其中较弱的那一半会拖累整体认定。回应信必须做出选择：要么专注论证单一事业，要么把两项事业都完整举证。这个案子正是因为两头都没押准而被拒绝。

“The beneficiary may be well positioned to advance the endeavor even if there is no certainty that the proposed endeavor will be a success. However, unsubstantiated claims are insufficient and would not meet the Petitioner's burden of proof.”

即使无法确定拟议事业一定会成功，受益人仍可能处于有利位置去推进该事业。但是，未经证实的主张是不够的，不能满足申请人的举证责任。

该案例在补件回应后仍被拒绝。

这句话很有用，因为它用移民官自己的话给出了标准：你不需要证明这项事业一定会成功，只需要证明你的主张是有依据的。很多申请人在这一点上反而过度承诺结果，其实他们本来只需要记录好一份计划和过往履历即可。