RFE 质疑「媒体报道」标准时会怎么写

“The current record does not clearly demonstrate that each submitted item constitutes independently published material about the petitioner. Several items appear to be general corporate announcements, performance summaries, or articles primarily about the petitioner's employer or its projects rather than about the petitioner and her work in the field.”

现有记录未能清楚证明每一份提交的材料都构成关于申请人本人的独立发表材料。若干材料似乎是泛泛的企业公告、业绩总结，或主要是关于申请人雇主或其项目的文章，而不是关于申请人本人及其在该领域的工作。

这跟"获奖"标准里同样的归属问题，只是换了一副外表。一篇宣布公司业绩的新闻稿，是关于公司的发表材料。递交前，请把每一篇剪报都读一遍，问一句：这句话真正的主语是谁。

“The petitioner has not provided objective information such as circulation figures, distribution data, target audience, or industry recognition to establish that these outlets are professional or major trade publications or other major media rather than internal publications, marketing platforms, or local sources with limited reach.”

申请人未能提供发行量数据、发行范围、目标读者群或行业认可度等客观信息，来证明这些媒体属于专业或主流行业出版物、或其他主流媒体，而不是内部刊物、营销平台或影响力有限的本地渠道。

第四个要件说的是"这家媒体本身够不够格"，几乎没有人会去举证这一点。被报道过，跟被一家"够格"的媒体报道过，是两件事，而证明这家媒体够格的责任在你这边。这是绝大多数申请材料直接跳过的那一半。

“The evidence does not consistently provide legible copies that show the title, date, and author of the material, nor does it include complete certified English translations for all non-English content as required by 8 CFR 103.2(b)(3).”

证据未能持续提供清晰可读、显示标题、日期与作者信息的副本，也未能对所有非英文内容附上完整的认证英文翻译，而这是 8 CFR 103.2(b)(3) 所要求的。

第二个要件是一个形式性要求，但同样会让案子失败。截取到只剩标题的截图，或者模糊到看不清作者的扫描件，都不满足要求——而每一份非英文剪报都需要认证翻译，不是摘要。认证翻译具体要求什么，见"程序性规则"那一页。