RFE 质疑「整体权衡」（Dhanasar 第三要素）时会怎么写

“The self-petitioner failed to submit evidence that their knowledge or skills are not easily articulated in a labor certification, they have not demonstrated, as claimed, that they present benefits to the United States through their proposed endeavor that outweigh those inherent in the labor certification process. In addition, the self-petitioner has not shown that they offer contributions of such value that, they would benefit the nation even if other qualified U.S. workers were available.”

申请人未能提交证据证明其知识或技能难以在劳工证程序中被充分表达；申请人也未能如其所主张的那样证明，其拟议事业为美国带来的利益超过了劳工证程序本身所固有的利益。此外，申请人也未能证明其贡献的价值足以让美国从中受益，即便存在其他符合资格的美国劳动者。

该案例在补件回应后仍被拒绝。

一句话里包含三个各自独立的子论点：(a) 你的技能无法用劳工证程序充分表达；(b) 你带来的利益超过了劳工证程序本身能提供的利益；(c) 即便有符合资格的美国劳动者，这份利益依然成立。绝大多数申请材料对这三点一个都没有论证，误以为第三要素会随着前两个要素自动成立。事实并非如此。