RFE 质疑「国家重要性」（Dhanasar 第一要素）时会怎么写

“The petitioner has not established that their proposed endeavor in the United States will have a broader impact on the field outside of their prospective clients. Benefits that are isolated to a single institution or locality in the United States might be so attenuated at the national level as to preclude a finding that the proposed endeavor has national importance.”

申请人未能证明其在美国拟议开展的事业，会在其潜在客户之外对该领域产生更广泛的影响。局限于美国某一机构或某一地区的利益，在全国层面可能被稀释得微不足道，以至于无法据此认定该拟议事业具有国家重要性。

该案例在补件回应后仍被拒绝。

"局限于某一机构或某一地区"是这里的关键措辞。服务客户型和咨询型的事业经常在这一点上栽跟头，因为它们的利益按定义就是局限于客户本身的。

“A review of the letters submitted in support of the self-petitioner reveals that the letters focused on the self-petitioner's experience and achievements, but they failed to provide any information about the national importance of the proposed endeavor.”

对支持申请人自我申请的信函进行审阅后发现，这些信函聚焦于申请人本人的经历与成就，却未能提供任何关于拟议事业国家重要性的信息。

该案例在补件回应后仍被拒绝。

几乎每一份薄弱的 NIW 材料里都会出现的一种推荐信失效模式：这一要素问的是"事业"，而信函却在夸"人"。按 EB-1A 那种"看这个人多厉害"的思路写出来的推荐信，完全答不到第一要素上。

“USCIS cannot conclude that any area where she will pursue the specific proposed endeavor is economically depressed, that the specific proposed endeavor would somehow lead to the employment of a significant population of workers in the area, or that it would somehow offer the region or its population a substantial positive economic benefit through employment levels, business activity, investment, or related tax revenue as contemplated by Dhanasar.”

USCIS 无法认定申请人计划开展该拟议事业的地区属于经济欠发达地区，也无法认定该拟议事业将带动该地区大量人口就业，或者会通过就业水平、商业活动、投资或相关税收为该地区或其居民带来 Dhanasar 框架所设想的实质性正面经济效益。

该案例在补件回应后获批。

这句话其实是一张伪装起来的检查清单：经济欠发达地区、创造就业、商业活动、投资、税收。每一项都可以单独举证。这个案子在补件回应后获批。