RFE 质疑「高薪」标准时会怎么写

“You submitted an income certificate, employment letter, salary guides, and payment records. However, the record contains no objective earnings data demonstrating that you have "commanded a high salary or other significantly high remuneration for services, in relation to others in the field as a [job title]."”

你提交了收入证明、在职证明、薪酬指南和支付记录。但记录中没有客观的收入数据能证明你"相较于该领域内担任 [职位名称] 的其他人，获得了高薪或其他显著偏高的报酬"。

该案例在补件回应后获批。

工资单能证明你赚了多少，但证明不了比较关系本身。缺的那一块是同一岗位、同一市场下的独立基准数据——而移民官对"该领域"的理解，是你的具体职位，不是你的整个行业。

“Since bonus money and stocks are fluid, you cannot use them to support your claim of high remuneration.”

由于奖金和股票具有波动性，你不能用它们来支持你关于高报酬的主张。

该案例在补件回应后获批。

这是一句直白、绝对的表述，常常让薪酬以股权为主的高管和创业公司员工感到意外。如果当初的主张是按总薪酬算的，只算基本工资很可能根本达不到门槛——提前知道这一点，好过写完回应信才发现。

“The record does not suggest that you have ever been employed in the United States. The USCIS Policy Manual ... advises officers to "evaluate persons working outside of the United States based on the wage statistics or comparable evidence relevant to the applicable work location, rather than by simply converting the salary to U.S. dollars and then viewing whether that salary would be considered high in the United States." As such, the salary data information for "senior architects" in the United States as well as the currency conversion chart were given no relevant value under this criterion.”

记录并未表明你曾在美国境内工作。USCIS Policy Manual……建议移民官"按照适用工作地点的工资统计数据或可比证据来评估在美国境外工作的人，而不是简单地把薪资折算成美元，再看这个数字在美国算不算高"。因此，美国"高级架构师"的薪酬数据以及货币折算表，在本标准下均被认定无相关价值。

该案例在补件回应后获批。

这是整套语料里对"从未在美国工作过的申请人"最具决定性的一句话。默认做法——把薪酬折算成美元、再跟美国市场数据比——在这里不只是论证薄弱，而是被认定完全没有价值。比较对象是你自己所在国家、所在城市里做同一份工作的人。一份折算成美元后看起来很惊艳的薪酬包，仍然可能不满足本标准；而一份折算成美元后看起来平平无奇的薪酬，也可能满足本标准。动笔之前，先按本地工资统计数据搭好比较基准。

“[The record included income documentation, individual income tax records, and public announcements of a separate company's acquisition of a minority equity stake in the beneficiary's employer at a stated purchase price.] This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not establish that the beneficiary's salary or remuneration is high relative to others working in the field ... with foreign tax documents alone. Furthermore, the Petitioner has not submitted sufficient evidence with which to compare the Petitioner's salary to others in similar fields.”

［记录里包括收入证明、个人所得税记录，以及另一家公司以某个价格收购受益人雇主少数股权的公开公告。］由于境外税务文件本身不能证明受益人的薪酬或报酬相对于该领域其他从业者显著偏高，本标准未被满足。此外，申请人未能提交足够证据将其薪酬与同类领域的其他人进行比较。

该案例在补件回应后仍被拒绝。

这跟本系列里其他薪酬驳回的错误不一样：这份材料试图用第三方对整个公司的估值——来自一次少数股权收购——来替代某位高管个人赚了多少。公司估值和个人报酬不是同一件事，移民官把两者当成互不相关的事实来处理。这个案子在补件回应后被拒绝。